Base Image Credit: LivingCraft.com
Novel Title: A Tale of Two Cities // Author: Charles Dickens // Publisher: Dover Publications // Editors: Paul Negri and Julie Nord
Favorite Quote: “He had expected neither to walk on pavements of gold, nor to lie on beds of roses: if he had any such exalted expectation, he would not have prospered. He had expected labor, and he found it, and he did it, and made the best of it. In this, his prosperity consisted.” -Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities
In part for the sake of clarification, and again in part for the sake of comic irony, I have decided to write this review as two reviews. One will be story focused, the other more technical. And of course, because it’s me, I’ll begin with story.
He is an average man in Paris, France, 1789. For years he has been oppressed- clothed in rags, over-worked, and under-fed. He spends each day trying to keep his children alive… but wishing that he could die. The government, separate from the people in all things except for the stealing of their goods, lavishes in luxurious homes, glutting on chocolates and other rich food, while he scrambles for the smallest scrap of meat or crumb of bread. How can he help but hear the silent echoes in streets, screaming dangerous words like Justice and Revenge?
The call to arms against the Marquis, an evil and foolish official, is stealthily taken up. Revenge comes fast, in the wake of much death and blood. But they who have been oppressed for so long are not easily satisfied. The hazy line between the afflicters and the afflicted all but vanishes, and once-peasants in new found seats of power become drunk in their retribution. La Guillotine rears her ugly head, and innocent men lose theirs.
In nearby England, a blameless captive of the French prison The Bastille, Dr. Alexander Manette is released, but his ransom price is heavy- his mind is all but broken. Only with the loving and constant nursing of his daughter Lucie and the help of an old banker is he able to recover. Meanwhile, Charles Darnay, a young immigrant from France, is put on trial for a crime that he did not commit. Proven innocent by a man (who looks curiously alike him, but could be no more different,) named Sydney Carton, he is freed to live another day.
Owing his freedom in part to Lucie, Darnay makes himself known to the Manette family, and spends more and more time with her and her father, as well as the banker (Mr. Lorry) and family friend Ms. Pross. But soon, family ties to France darkening his past, Darnay is called back to right the wrongs of his ancestors. He follows the call, unknowing of the angry citizens who intend to end his life.
Upon his arrival in Paris, Charles is immediately taken into captivity in La Force, a prison. Robbed of his rights, and forced to pay for his prison accommodations, he sends a letter to the Manettes for help. They arrive, along with Sydney Carton, in time to find that Charles Darnay is sentenced to a trial by the people, and likely following, a meeting with La Guillotine.
__________________________________________________
Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities was a thick, edifying, entertaining, and beautifully written novel. His placement and usage of words to convey specific emotions and hidden meanings made the story valuable, and more than worth reading.
My favorite part of Cities was what I interpreted as the main theme: Recalled to life. A passage quoted frequently, esp. towards the end, was this:
I am the Resurrection and the Life, saith the Lord: he that believeth in me in me, though he were dead, yet he shall live: and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. (John 11:25)
This was used perfectly in terms of sacrifice, new life, and redemption. Being a Christian, I can further appreciate how important this theme was, though from my readings of Dickens, I am unable to tell if he meant all the marvelous things he wrote down. But, in terms of truth, they were dead on.
Also, his writing of love, and the ties between love and sacrifice, was revealing. I think if he so desired, Dickens could have written an entire book on this subject in itself. One might even go so far as to say that he did. I suggest it for historic purposes, as well as for simple interest. But whatever you read it for, you can be certain it will change you, and I hope, for the better.